﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Steve Baugh - Quality Testing</title>
    <description>Steven Baugh is the Manager of Analytical Services for ChromaDex Inc, Boulder Colorado. ChromaDex is now the leading supplier of botanical reference standards and phytochemical products and analytical services to the dietary supplement, nutraceutical and pharmaceutical markets. Mr. Baugh has over 15 years of natural product analytical experience.</description>
    <link>http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/BlogId/8/Default.aspx</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <managingEditor>steveb@chromadex.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>len.monheit@penton.com</webMaster>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:38:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:38:15 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>Blog RSS Generator Version 3.5.1.19887</generator>
    <item>
      <title>Water Damage Part II</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"&gt;Seems like the water issue is moving backwards, not forwards. There must be some force (dollars) driving the misrepresentation of water in raw materials. In our opinion, the single biggest adulterant in raw materials is, yes you guessed it…water.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;a href=http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/74/Water-Damage-Part-II.aspx&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/74/Water-Damage-Part-II.aspx</link>
      <author>steveb@chromadex.com</author>
      <comments>http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/74/Water-Damage-Part-II.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/74/Water-Damage-Part-II.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://blogs.npicenter.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=74</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Water Damage: Part 1</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Part One in a three part series highlighting the negative effects of water in raw materials on our industry&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href=http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/72/Water-Damage-Part-1.aspx&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/72/Water-Damage-Part-1.aspx</link>
      <author>steveb@chromadex.com</author>
      <comments>http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/72/Water-Damage-Part-1.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/72/Water-Damage-Part-1.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://blogs.npicenter.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=72</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Not all microencapsulants are created equal</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Lets talk about microencapsulated fat-soluble vitamins.  There are many forms, and several new encapsulants have appeared over the past few years. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href=http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/66/Not-all-microencapsulants-are-created-equal.aspx&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/66/Not-all-microencapsulants-are-created-equal.aspx</link>
      <author>steveb@chromadex.com</author>
      <comments>http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/66/Not-all-microencapsulants-are-created-equal.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/66/Not-all-microencapsulants-are-created-equal.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://blogs.npicenter.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=66</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>99% Pure?  Sure it is (wink wink jab jab)</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There are a lot of 98% plus purity raw materials showing up in the market place these days.  Are they for real?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href=http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/61/99-Pure-Sure-it-is-wink-wink-jab-jab.aspx&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/61/99-Pure-Sure-it-is-wink-wink-jab-jab.aspx</link>
      <author>steveb@chromadex.com</author>
      <comments>http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/61/99-Pure-Sure-it-is-wink-wink-jab-jab.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/61/99-Pure-Sure-it-is-wink-wink-jab-jab.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://blogs.npicenter.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=61</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Antioxidant Testing</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small"&gt;The FDA has clearly stated, and restated, the requirements for an antioxidant claim.  This opinion is contrary to popular momentum in the industry.  It seems that every day new products appear with claims based solely on ORAC or some other non-specific testing method clearly not allowed by the Antioxidant Final Rule.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href=http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/52/Antioxidant-Testing.aspx&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/52/Antioxidant-Testing.aspx</link>
      <author>steveb@chromadex.com</author>
      <comments>http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/52/Antioxidant-Testing.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/52/Antioxidant-Testing.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://blogs.npicenter.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=52</trackback:ping>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reference Materials: Use and Limitations in the Laboratory</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial"&gt;This discussion will focus on testing and reference materials in the analytical laboratory.  Different types of reference materials will be covered, including the uses and limitations of each.  Real-life examples will be used to illustrate the topics covered.  Please feel free to jump in and critique, commiserate or challenge whatever is presented.  We can all learn from each other and that will make things more interesting!!&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href=http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/42/Reference-Materials-Use-and-Limitations-in-the-Laboratory.aspx&gt;More...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <link>http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/42/Reference-Materials-Use-and-Limitations-in-the-Laboratory.aspx</link>
      <author>steveb@chromadex.com</author>
      <comments>http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/42/Reference-Materials-Use-and-Limitations-in-the-Laboratory.aspx#Comments</comments>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blogs.npicenter.com/Blogs/tabid/37/EntryId/42/Reference-Materials-Use-and-Limitations-in-the-Laboratory.aspx</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
      <trackback:ping>http://blogs.npicenter.com/DesktopModules/Blog/Trackback.aspx?id=42</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>